RCCanada - Canada Radio Controlled Hobby Forum - Reply to Topic
RCCanada - Canada's Radio Control Hobby Forum
Electric Flight Discuss Electric Flight in Canada

Thread: Battery packs in a Twin Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
06-26-2010 04:12 PM
Dangaras
Re: Battery packs in a Twin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max View Post
Andre, does this work with charging too?

I have one of these gadgets:


Most of my packs are 2200, not all are the same brand. I am assuming I can charge either brand of the same capacity. Can I mix capacities as well? Ie 1800 in one and 2200 in the other?
Max,

with an intelligent charger that monitors cell voltage probably yes. I have never tried as I have multiple chargers and run them off a solar/ pb battery system and don't see the need. problem is sometimes the Charge C rate is 1 or 2 /d now can be up to 5......

So to elaborate, you will either have to charge at 1C if you want to charge the different cells, but I would not recommend it as the smart charger would see 2, 3 cell packs as a 6 cell and would probably stop charging if 3 of the cells were at full capacity and the other 3 were not... Would most likely report a fault.
06-26-2010 03:10 PM
Max
Re: Battery packs in a Twin

Andre, does this work with charging too?

I have one of these gadgets:


Most of my packs are 2200, not all are the same brand. I am assuming I can charge either brand of the same capacity. Can I mix capacities as well? Ie 1800 in one and 2200 in the other?
06-26-2010 11:44 AM
Dangaras
Re: Battery packs in a Twin

And just to be complete, I recorded a test I performed using two batteries, a Zippy 3S, 2200mAh, 20C in parallel with a No-name RCmodelpart 3S, 1500mah, 20C connected in parallel. The no-name displayed 0.1V total less than the Zippy at the start.

I used a Turnigy 35-32, Plush 60A ESC, Precision watt meter & power analyzer, 6 cell LED battery monitors, Ar6110 & a DX7.

The tests showed that even with the no-name having smaller main leads, the 6 cell monitors showed consistent cell voltage & total voltage decrease across all 6 cells. The power meter displayed 0.2V less than the cell monitors as all of these items are NOT calibrated so are best for monitoring only.

As the power was pushed up to 200W the batteries decreased together down to about 11.2V. When the power was reduced the voltages would rise and almost equalize as per the 6 cell displays.

This proves that the paralleling of batteries provides consistent and repeatable (I performed the test before I recorded it as my camera flash card was full & I did not realize it until I was done.) power delivery. I will post the video after I have converted it and pushed it up to youtube.

+ YouTube Video
ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.


As any EE would know when designing circuits and a certain capacitor value or battery capacity is required for a specific circuit implementation one is often forced to combine caps and packs to achieve the desired result. Selecting Caps and battery packs from the same product line is best, but not always possible and as demonstrated does not affect performance. That said matched parts would be preferred for optimum efficiency, but this is not the space shuttle.
06-26-2010 08:32 AM
Dangaras
Re: Battery packs in a Twin

Quote:
Originally Posted by stegl View Post
If you are convinced that you are right ; all the power to you but my twin will be using matched Lipos (cells , capacity and c- rating). I prefer to keep 'em fly'in .
Sure. Have fun flying any way you can, even if for less time.
06-26-2010 08:30 AM
Dangaras
Re: Battery packs in a Twin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spitball View Post
The principle of storing energy is totally different in a capacitor to an accumulator, be it Pb, Cd or whatever, I'm afraid.
That is correct as per the comment in my previous rant...... Caps are charge separation by application of a voltage & batteries are chemical conversion.
06-26-2010 07:40 AM
Spitball
Re: Battery packs in a Twin

The principle of storing energy is totally different in a capacitor to an accumulator, be it Pb, Cd or whatever, I'm afraid.
06-26-2010 12:41 AM
stegl
Re: Battery packs in a Twin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangaras View Post
Batteries are large capacitors. Capacitors hold charge as do batteries but for far shorter periods because of the internal design.

Take two different cells and parallel them. When discharging them monitor the voltage of each cell with a battery monitor and you will see the individual cells will maintain their voltages.

Capacitors have a characteristic called ESR which is the effective series resistance that acts in the same manner as the C rating of a battery. Basic electrical theory 101, when you place two capacitors 10uF & 90uF in parallel the values add to give you a total of 100uf.

Capacitors also have a voltage rating, V that determines the maximum voltage that they can be subjected to. So capacitors must have the same V rating when placed in parallel to withstand the voltage of the circuit, like batteries the V is the exact same & different ESR values will cause different discharge rates like using different C rated batteries.

When two capacitors are placed in parallel, and a voltage applied, they both charge to the Voltage level they are rated to (for simplicity sake, usually a little more), but they hold different amounts of energy. The same way that batteries are charged EXACTLY as a capacitor is except batteries convert a chemical to store energy, when you apply the voltage, the capacitor will absorb as much charge as it is is defined by the following E= 1/2(C(V^2))
Learn more at http://community.myelectrical.com/wi...apacitors.aspx

And when you apply a load to use the stored charge, the load does not see 2 sources it sees one. Both capacitors will discharge according to the charge they have stored regardless of the mismatch. In the background the capacitor with the lower charge capacity will be fed by the higher capacity cap, but the load will continue to receive the full current as demanded.

A high resistance or open cell is less critical in a parallel circuit than the serial configuration but the parallel pack will have reduced load capability and a shorter runtime. It's like an engine running only on three cylinders. An electrical short would be more devastating because the faulty cell would drain the energy from the other cells, causing a fire hazard.

WARNING:

Charging and discharging lithium-ion batteries

Lithium-ion batteries are safe when used as directed. The same safety cannot be assured if individual cells of unknown nature are connected in series and parallel to build a battery pack. Not all lithium-ion cells are suited for muli-cell packs. Only cells that meet tight voltage and capacity tolerances can be used for serial and parallel connection. Mismatched packs are subject to overcharge, resulting in venting with flame and fire. Check with the cell manufacturer if the cells are suitable for multi-cell packs.
If you are convinced that you are right ; I will let you store your energy in Capacitors and I will use lipos; all the power to you but my twin will be using matched Lipos (cells , capacity and c- rating). I prefer to keep 'em fly'in .
06-25-2010 09:42 PM
Dangaras
Re: Battery packs in a Twin

Quote:
Originally Posted by stegl View Post
Sorry but running two diferent capacity batteries in parallel or in series is definitely a NO-NO ! One question ? How does the 2000 mah know to only supply 1/3 and the 4000 mah pac know to only supply 2/3 of the power ??? They don't . The same amount power will be withdrawn from each battery so when a total of 4000 mah is taken out ; the 2000 mah pac will be empty and the 4000 mah pac will still have 2000 mah in it. As you continue to draw power , what was the 2000 mah pac will become toast . That's my story and I am sticking to it .

Batteries are large capacitors. Capacitors hold charge as do batteries but for far shorter periods because of the internal design.

Take two different cells and parallel them. When discharging them monitor the voltage of each cell with a battery monitor and you will see the individual cells will maintain their voltages.

Capacitors have a characteristic called ESR which is the effective series resistance that acts in the same manner as the C rating of a battery. Basic electrical theory 101, when you place two capacitors 10uF & 90uF in parallel the values add to give you a total of 100uf.

Capacitors also have a voltage rating, V that determines the maximum voltage that they can be subjected to. So capacitors must have the same V rating when placed in parallel to withstand the voltage of the circuit, like batteries the V is the exact same & different ESR values will cause different discharge rates like using different C rated batteries.

When two capacitors are placed in parallel, and a voltage applied, they both charge to the Voltage level they are rated to (for simplicity sake, usually a little more), but they hold different amounts of energy. The same way that batteries are charged EXACTLY as a capacitor is except batteries convert a chemical to store energy, when you apply the voltage, the capacitor will absorb as much charge as it is is defined by the following E= 1/2(C(V^2))
Learn more at http://community.myelectrical.com/wi...apacitors.aspx

And when you apply a load to use the stored charge, the load does not see 2 sources it sees one. Both capacitors will discharge according to the charge they have stored regardless of the mismatch. In the background the capacitor with the lower charge capacity will be fed by the higher capacity cap, but the load will continue to receive the full current as demanded.

A high resistance or open cell is less critical in a parallel circuit than the serial configuration but the parallel pack will have reduced load capability and a shorter runtime. It's like an engine running only on three cylinders. An electrical short would be more devastating because the faulty cell would drain the energy from the other cells, causing a fire hazard.

WARNING:

Charging and discharging lithium-ion batteries

Lithium-ion batteries are safe when used as directed. The same safety cannot be assured if individual cells of unknown nature are connected in series and parallel to build a battery pack. Not all lithium-ion cells are suited for muli-cell packs. Only cells that meet tight voltage and capacity tolerances can be used for serial and parallel connection. Mismatched packs are subject to overcharge, resulting in venting with flame and fire. Check with the cell manufacturer if the cells are suitable for multi-cell packs.
06-25-2010 09:37 PM
stegl
Re: Battery packs in a Twin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max View Post
It is a top flite kit.
The wings are all sheeted except the nacells. Fuel tanks are already installed.
The fuselage is done, but you have to appreciate the cavernous fuselage for batteries

I know going to electrics for me is an afterthought. I am still on the fence given your suggestions. Just scroll down a few posts and see about a fella asking about a motor combo for making his TF DC3 electric. After looking up the specs for him, I had to pause and go Hmmmmmm.....

On mine the flaps and retracts are installed, and all wing control functions are direct servo links
Don't think fuel twin motor running is dependable enough; that's my view from experience. With the new brushless motors out now you get tons of power in a small package. What is the length/ width and height in the fuel tank compartment and is the tank cover easily removeable ?
06-25-2010 09:08 PM
stegl
Re: Battery packs in a Twin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangaras View Post
There will always be some sort of imbalance from cell to cell, however, you can put a 2000mAh battery in parallel with a 4000mAh battery to get 6000 total as long as they are rated the same voltage and discharge.. If you lose 1 cell of say 6 from 2 packs that are 3 cells each in parallel, you are still able to fly, if you lost 1 cell of a 3S pack in an isolated pack situation, you would lose an engine..

For simplicity they will discharge in the following way, the 2000 mAh battery will supply 1/3 of the required current and the 4000mAh will supply 2/3 of the current as long as they maintain the exact same voltage, then if one drops below the other (which it never will because they are in parallel), the higher one will make up the difference until it's charge is equalized.

It is way safer and better than running two separate packs. I am converting a twin now that was initially setup the isolated way, the pack that runs the receiver and hence servos always hits the low voltage warning before the other pack & that has caused me to learn to fly on one engine a couple of times..

All of my twins are wired this way where I cant get a single larger pack to fit somewhere convenient.
Sorry but running two diferent capacity batteries in parallel or in series is definitely a NO-NO ! One question ? How does the 2000 mah know to only supply 1/3 and the 4000 mah pac know to only supply 2/3 of the power ??? They don't . The same amount power will be withdrawn from each battery so when a total of 4000 mah is taken out ; the 2000 mah pac will be empty and the 4000 mah pac will still have 2000 mah in it. As you continue to draw power , what was the 2000 mah pac will become toast . That's my story and I am sticking to it .
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.


vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.