RCCanada - Canada Radio Controlled Hobby Forum - Reply to Topic
RCCanada - Canada's Radio Control Hobby Forum
Electronics Discuss radios, chargers, etc...

Thread: reciever range Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
01-01-2011 07:52 PM
philipa_240sx
Re: reciever range

I just replied to you PM 43.

The clone DSM2 RX's are totally different and the range may be far less.

What bothers me more is their reliability. There have been many posts about dud's, poor range, etc. I wouldn't trust any of my planes to them.
01-01-2011 05:52 PM
43
Re: reciever range

thank you! happy new year!
12-30-2010 06:34 PM
smoknrv4
Re: reciever range

Quote:
Originally Posted by philipa_240sx View Post
There have been a few static tests of the AR6100 on RCG and WF which showed the range to be anywhere between 2.5 to 4.5 km with a clear line of sight.

I have never had a signal loss with my AR6100 (and 6110's) and I've had them pretty far out. However, I have never gotten anywhere close to 2.5km... I would loose sight of the plane first!

When flying 2.4, range is more affected by RF 'shielding' than distance. The wavelength is so short that any metallic object like motors, battery packs, heli frames, etc as well as carbon fibre can actually shield the signal from the antenna. The full range RX's overcome this by using multiple antennas placed in two or more locations. 'Antenna diversity' in RF speak.

Note: On the AR500/600, the longer coaxial antenna lead is not the entire antenna, only the last 3cm is. Hence, you can separate them for antenna diversity.

IMHO, use the Parkflyer RX's for small models under 48" WS and smaller heli's. Anything bigger (or more expensive) should get a full range RX like the AR600, AR6200, AR7000 etc.
Thanks for that good info, I'm am also new to 2.4 world. I use the 6100e on my foamies with no problems.
12-30-2010 06:20 PM
philipa_240sx
Re: reciever range

There have been a few static tests of the AR6100 on RCG and WF which showed the range to be anywhere between 2.5 to 4.5 km with a clear line of sight.

I have never had a signal loss with my AR6100 (and 6110's) and I've had them pretty far out. However, I have never gotten anywhere close to 2.5km... I would loose sight of the plane first!

When flying 2.4, range is more affected by RF 'shielding' than distance. The wavelength is so short that any metallic object like motors, battery packs, heli frames, etc as well as carbon fibre can actually shield the signal from the antenna. The full range RX's overcome this by using multiple antennas placed in two or more locations. 'Antenna diversity' in RF speak.

Note: On the AR500/600, the longer coaxial antenna lead is not the entire antenna, only the last 3cm is. Hence, you can separate them for antenna diversity.

IMHO, use the Parkflyer RX's for small models under 48" WS and smaller heli's. Anything bigger (or more expensive) should get a full range RX like the AR600, AR6200, AR7000 etc.
12-30-2010 05:28 PM
Flybaby
Re: reciever range

Agree with Mogman about not flying beyond visual range. They are after all a "Park Flyer receiver". That is ment to mean a "Ball Park" and not Algonquin Park. lol
12-30-2010 01:40 PM
mogman
Re: reciever range

I'm not sure what the actual range is, but I have quite a few of the ar6100's and have had no range issues. Being that they are small(40 inch-ish)planes, I don't fly past the point that they become hard to see.
12-30-2010 01:32 PM
43
reciever range

whats the range on the horizon spectrum ar6100e park flyer reciever?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.


vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.