RCCanada - Canada Radio Controlled Hobby Forum - Reply to Topic
RCCanada - Canada's Radio Control Hobby Forum
Electronics Discuss radios, chargers, etc...

Thread: Which Radio not to buy Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
04-28-2016 06:46 AM
RAMJET
Re: Which Radio not to buy

Quote:
Originally Posted by fsone View Post
Well Said Roger. I wonder if some of the members here on the forum will finally get the picture?
Yeah,You can bring a horse to water ,or in this case drag the dead horse . LOL . just saying Cheers Roger

Like my good buddy Dale once told me, if you really want to know how to do something right ask someone doing it right . so true . The real question should be what radio should I buy and how do I use it to be successful .
04-27-2016 03:33 PM
fsone
Re: Which Radio not to buy

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAMJET View Post
Yeah I remember when 2.4 first came out and guys were doing brown out crashes left and right with undersized NiMh batteries . there is a big learning curve to using 2.4 and some guys adapt better than others . safe setups and practices for 2.4 are well documented now so if you want to do the research you can be successful . I would suggest a person buy a radio they fully know and understand rather than presume to think I could somehow know what radio they don't know how to use correctly . For example what good would it do for a guy to buy a radio, have a bunch of problems and tell you the radio is no good when you don't know his abilities .If someone told you don't buy a car because they had one and got into a lot of accidents what would you think. cheers Roger
Well Said Roger. I wonder if some of the members here on the forum will finally get the picture?
04-26-2016 11:37 AM
tporter416
Re: Which Radio not to buy

It is hard to compare Spektrum and Futaba, but lets throw in some info...

1) Futaba uses a Micro Linear ML2724 transceiver for communication for the FASST protocol. This transciever requires a baseband IC for the actual communications protocol, which allows Futaba more control over the communications. This chip according to the press release was launched in Oct 2003. Sensitivity of this chip according to them is 90dBm with 3dBm differential output power max.
2) Spektrum uses an SPI to 2.4GHz converter chip from Cypress, the CYRF6936 chip, which does a lot of the communications overhead for you, basically offloading Spektrum from doing a bunch of the design work. Which means the DSM protocol is mainly done by Cypress. The chip does include CRC checking for packets, and is fully bidirectional data. This chip was launched in, best I can find, Dec 2004. According to the data sheet it has a transmit power up to +4 dBm and a sensitivity of 97 dBm.

The numbers for power and sensitivity can be misleading as a lot of that comes down to circuit design and antenna design, so even though the chips can achieve these numbers, it doesn't mean our transmitters can.

One interesting note, both chips suggest the applications are wireless mouses, keyboards, gaming controllers, home automation, toys, etc...

This doesn't mean that both Futaba and Spektrum have not done a huge amount of R&D to ensure that these systems are safe for use, they know the implications and I am comfortable using either. At my field we have had a lot of experience with Orange receivers cutting out if you get to close to the hydro lines, never seen anyone have issues with Spektrum, Jeti, Futaba or JR at our field...

Tom
04-26-2016 08:40 AM
adaptabl
Re: Which Radio not to buy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cougar429 View Post
Not that important, but I thought the Futaba FASST system came out ahead of Spektrum.
Gary. I think Futaba was doing spread spectrum for a number of years in other applications other than R/C. I also think they are the only ones doing a custom chipset for this. Spektrum was first to market a R/C system to the general public with the first DSM park flyer system. I think is was the original DX6 was launched in 2005. Futaba launched the first full range R/C system shortly after that. Spektrum then released the DSM2 system for full range models with the satellite receivers and a 2 channel non-hopping link.
04-25-2016 04:23 PM
stegl
Re: Which Radio not to buy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cougar429 View Post
Not that important, but I thought the Futaba FASST system came out ahead of Spektrum.
I believe Futaba and then Airtronics and Hitec in there somewhere ; later on ; as they didn't do all the design errors.
04-25-2016 04:16 PM
RAMJET
Re: Which Radio not to buy

I had the first Gen spektrum system and I never had brown out problems but I was also one of the first to use a-123 batteries, quite by chance but that proved to be what was needed (a-123/ lipo / liFe) ,My system has since been upgraded by horizon hobby to dsmx, they replaced all my receivers (12 x 9100 power safe ) no charge.cant beat that for service and upgraded my JR 12x to boot .
04-25-2016 03:51 PM
Cougar429
Re: Which Radio not to buy

Not that important, but I thought the Futaba FASST system came out ahead of Spektrum.
04-25-2016 02:27 PM
adaptabl
Re: Which Radio not to buy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cougar429 View Post
David, IMO the brownout problems I saw seemed to be more prevalent with electrics that used ESC/BEC combis. 2.4 and the explosion of electric gear happened at the same time and there was a learning curve for both.

Add in digital servos, which are current hogs, and the math added up to more than the flight power system could provide.

As mentioned, some 2.4 were more vulnerable and to save arguments will not list the ones I know here.

Anyway, a lot of onboard BEC's were, (and still are) of low current capability. That and the fact they can suffer heat created by the ESC circuitry, (and electrical noise) meant they could reach thermal shutdown or load the receiver with RF to the point control was lost. We learned a lot with helis which are RF nightmares and hard to isolate systems from one another due to the lack of room.

If you factor in the ratings listed with most of these were only good with a minimum 5MPH airflow then burying the ESC inside the fuse or in stagnant airflow meant severely reduced capability and even greater risk of heating.

I learned early to go with separate BEC's and never suffered flight system loss due to power issues.

Oh, and the thought that 72MHz systems came back up quicker must come from someone who never flew Futaba PCM. Tack on their synth module and boot up could take in excess of 5-6 seconds. Lots of ground can be covered, (or buried in) by the time you regained control......Don't ask.
Spektrum paid a price for being first to market with a 2.4G system to the mass market. The early design had a high voltage cut off and any brownout could easily result in a reboot. also the early reboot time was very long to reconnect after a reboot.

The one other problem is that in having a older 2.4 chipset the sensitivity is much lower than the competition that came to market later. That is the reason Spektrum needs the extra sat receivers. Although they have seemed to resolve the voltage issues and reboot times. They are stuck with a low sensitivity chipset. Unfortunately since the major manufacturers use off the shelf 2.4 G chipsets from cordless phones they have no input on design features for these chipsets and have to live with what is there.
04-25-2016 10:56 AM
Cougar429
Re: Which Radio not to buy

I too run Castle gear and some of their early stuff had problems. They had the guts to admit it and fix them for free.

I neglected to mention some other factors that can come into play. Discounting digitals, as the number of servos increases the current demands can increase to where other components in the supply chain will fall short. Most of the stock switches supplied for flight gear are only rated for a max of 4A with the servo/BEC plugs in that range, as well. Add in long servo extensions of thin gauge wire, (24 being common) with multiple plugs and you can exacerbate the problems.

One of the biggest current hogs I found were servoless retracts. Good units can have current shutoffs if binding occurs, but almost all have significant draw at the start of the cycle.

I often found servo extensions not only the wrong length for my apps, but also using that thing gauge conductor. I stock up on the 22 ga every year in Toledo, along with refilling my plug and pin assortments and fab my own.

ps. Although still 72MHz, I opted long ago to go with Castle Berg receivers. In most cases they were lighter, smaller, less expensive and had programmable outputs and failsafe features, the original thinking in using PCM gear. Except for some issues with plug wear for the crystals, prevented by the simple use of tape to keep them rigid, they have proven rock solid. That and their auto-shift capability meant they were compatible with just about every system out there.

I've retrofitted only a few craft to 2.4, mostly keeping that to new builds. If their 7P had enough channels the originals remain Berg. In fact, the 7 channel limit was my only complaint.
04-25-2016 10:19 AM
stegl
Re: Which Radio not to buy

Nother Spek hit the dust , this last weekend but should be repairable. Not sure if it was brownout or what. Again when on the bench all seemed to work. I figure when no load on the servos the voltage is up there high enough to keep working. As Gary says it , if BEC's get overloaded and that brand doesn't like that. Part of the issue with cheap ESC/BEC's . I run up to 7 digital ( not all together) in several of my larger airplanes on 5 amp Castle ESC's and have never had an issue. But then then that radio system I am using has had the receiver tested down to 2 volts ( by the importer) and the receiver still keeps on chugging , thats less than half power voltage.
Then there are ESC/bec manufacturers that make power claims and there are those that produce power claims. Quality stuff always come out on top.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 PM.


vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.