|
|
|
| Multi Rotor Discussion Tri's, Quad's, Hex'as and more. Discuss anything multi-rotor, including multi-rotor stabilization and FPV setups. |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| 05-28-2014 11:01 AM | ||
| bcsaltchucker |
Re: Someone flying at Ontario Place (right by Billy Bishop) Quote:
|
|
| 05-26-2014 10:09 AM | ||
| Max |
Re: Someone flying at Ontario Place (right by Billy Bishop) Quote:
I hope he reads the comments in that YouTube page. Especially the one from "nilamotk" 
|
|
| 05-23-2014 05:40 PM | ||
| PureHash |
Re: Someone flying at Ontario Place (right by Billy Bishop) Smh... Literally RIGHT in the circuit for the airport.... There are some STUPID people in this world.. |
|
| 05-23-2014 03:30 PM | ||
| 399agl |
Re: Someone flying at Ontario Place (right by Billy Bishop) Some alerted me to another.... enjoy |
|
| 05-23-2014 01:15 PM | ||
| 399agl |
Re: Someone flying at Ontario Place (right by Billy Bishop) The point is that all these people have no clue that what they are doing is dangerous and illegal this is not the days of Rc clubs and education, Henrys is selling the phantom for goodness sake, to photographers who have no training some people are saying that if the firmware allows them to fly in gps mode then it's ok. DJI restrictions only include major airports such as pearson, even then it's only a 5 mile lockout , Pearsons control zone for those who don't know is 7 Nm. YTZ is 5 as is buttonville. Dji has not taken these into account, yet people are using them as evidence they are safe. Safety is one issue, as is being hired without insurance and permission as was believed done at ontario place. is another, there is no doubt in my mind that he would be considered as endangering airsafety as in the cars 602.45 No person shall fly a model aircraft or a kite or launch a model rocket or a rocket of a type used in a fireworks display into cloud or in a manner that is or is likely to be hazardous to aviation safety.. (legally he was at an altitude that aircraft fly in, usually light aircraft flying circuits around the cn tower, assuming the obvious, he had no way of being contacted by tower, no radio licence, no way of monitoring frequency, and no permission he would not know if an light aircraft was entering the space and a what altitude, was he "likely" to be a hazard, yes (the language does not say "is" just likely.) The fact he did it what looks early in the morning shows he is aware of some of the risks, who wouldn't be. He like so many others are not aware of the laws being broken,laws that have a are taken very seriously by the police. We have been trying to educate for years, the situation now is getting out of control. Not only will someone get hurt, it will bring everyone under the spotlight, a place where you wont want to be. |
|
| 05-22-2014 03:04 PM | ||
| PureHash |
Re: Someone flying at Ontario Place (right by Billy Bishop) Quote:
Please excuse my French, this actually pisses me off. |
|
| 05-22-2014 12:46 PM | ||
| Midair |
Re: Someone flying at Ontario Place (right by Billy Bishop) Quote:
Peter |
|
| 05-22-2014 12:24 PM | ||
| buffythesaint |
Re: Someone flying at Ontario Place (right by Billy Bishop) Education and communication is the key. TC doesn't have the manpower to track everything that happens. They need to educate and warn first time offenders, no fines I think. If they continue to do it, then a fine is warranted. If I saw something that was unsafe, I would try to educate them on the importance of safety. |
|
| 05-22-2014 11:55 AM | ||
| Midair |
Re: Someone flying at Ontario Place (right by Billy Bishop) Quote:
Peter |
|
| 05-22-2014 11:32 AM | ||
| buffythesaint |
Re: Someone flying at Ontario Place (right by Billy Bishop) I don't think a SFOC would of been issued for this type of flight. At that altitude, you would need a huge fenced off safety area, which would of been impossible. The CN Tower would never shut down for a Phantom flight and a gopro 
|
|
| This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. | ||
Your Privacy Choices