Register Now

DP01 · 11-23-2003, 08:46 AM

Jeff:

One thing for sure I wouldn't even try to define/interpret is: "… a careless, reckless, and/or dangerous manner."

Dennis

KevinPerry · 11-23-2003, 08:47 AM

I agree to ...get it out

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimMoss

Remove it!! ...... Do we have Seconder?

Lets see ..... ronm ... Derrick ..... Jim Mc ...... Marc ..... PASSED!

J_Helps · 11-23-2003, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DP01

Jeff:

One thing for sure I wouldn't even try to define/interpret is: "… a careless, reckless, and/or dangerous manner."

Dennis

Agreed. I was thinking more about the first part of the line Where established, I will abide by the safety rules for the flying site I use ...
Perhaps we should leave the details of the development of control measures up to the local club to deal with under broad MAAC guidelines. Micro-managing from the "centre" never seems to work.

JH

Guest · 11-23-2003, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hughes500E

I know better than to reply to the above but, when MAAC does a 100% increase, I know one guy we might be able to thank

.....lighten up a little :P

Hughes500E · 11-23-2003, 12:20 PM

edited!

Guest · 11-23-2003, 01:39 PM

nm

Rammer64 · 11-27-2003, 09:56 PM

Just food for thought!
You can't ban 3D, jets, pattern, etc; but you can set a level of competence in each area. You do it from beginner to pilot and to jet. Why not let a hobbiest prove his competence in each level and group and AFTER they have proved themselves worthy, then they can decide if they are good enough to grab a rudder in hover. I think we're trying to put the cart before the horse and demean this hobby by POSTING HAZZARDS and DANGERS that are truely far and minimal. Yes there are crashes and accidents. There are more crashes and accidents in racing F1 or NASCAR, IRL, NHRA, but even though they have rules and limits, those governing bodies still allow enhancement and growth, technological change and experiments of their respective sport.
Stop asking MAAC to put the BRAKES on this sport from growth.

ronnieo · 11-28-2003, 02:54 PM

.......we fly only in 2D...........the planes goes from one end of the runway to the other and you refuel it and turn around........just like R/C cars.......and that keeps the insurance company happy and perfectly within their tolerance level.

Suggest it at the next AGM. End of argument. No?

11-23-2003, 08:46 AM	#31
DP01 RCC Senior Contributor I am: Dennis P Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Southern Ontario Feedback: 10 / 100% Posts: 687 Total Props: 3	Remove this ad - become a site supporter! Jeff: One thing for sure I wouldn't even try to define/interpret is: "… a careless, reckless, and/or dangerous manner." Dennis __________________ "Simplicate and add lightness"
	.

11-27-2003, 09:56 PM	#37
Rammer64 Guest Join Date: Oct 2002 Feedback: 0 / 0% Posts: 569 Total Props: 0	STAGES of COMPETENCE Just food for thought! You can't ban 3D, jets, pattern, etc; but you can set a level of competence in each area. You do it from beginner to pilot and to jet. Why not let a hobbiest prove his competence in each level and group and AFTER they have proved themselves worthy, then they can decide if they are good enough to grab a rudder in hover. I think we're trying to put the cart before the horse and demean this hobby by POSTING HAZZARDS and DANGERS that are truely far and minimal. Yes there are crashes and accidents. There are more crashes and accidents in racing F1 or NASCAR, IRL, NHRA, but even though they have rules and limits, those governing bodies still allow enhancement and growth, technological change and experiments of their respective sport. Stop asking MAAC to put the BRAKES on this sport from growth.
	.

11-28-2003, 02:54 PM	#38
ronnieo RCC Supreme Contributor I am: Ron Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Windsor Ontario Radio of choice: Futaba # of RCs: 23 Feedback: 0 / 0% Posts: 2,040 Total Props: 19	I say to satisfy the new 3D rule...... .......we fly only in 2D...........the planes goes from one end of the runway to the other and you refuel it and turn around........just like R/C cars.......and that keeps the insurance company happy and perfectly within their tolerance level. Suggest it at the next AGM. End of argument. No? __________________ Hangar Nine SpitFire..Saito.100 Top Flite P51..Saito.91 RCGUYS Decathlon..SPE 26
	.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-23-2003, 12:20 PM	#35
Hughes500E RCC Supreme Contributor I am: Steve H. Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Armstrong BC Feedback: 34 / 100% Posts: 3,757 Total Props: 16	edited!
	.

11-23-2003, 01:39 PM	#36
Guest Guest Join Date: Sep 2002 Feedback: 0 / 0% Posts: 0 Total Props: 57	nm
	.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

vBulletin Message

Cancel Changes

Register Now

Log-in