Saito engine size - RCCanada - Canada Radio Controlled Hobby Forum
RCCanada - Canada's Radio Control Hobby Forum
Engines Discuss engines

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-23-2005, 02:19 AM   #1
shawn085
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005

Feedback: 0 / 0%
Posts: 23
Total Props: 0
Saito engine size


       Remove this ad - become a site supporter!
I am looking for a saito 4 stroke that will fit in a 40-45 size plane. I like lots of power. The bigger the better. I have a friend putting a .90 saito in his. I don't want that big but what one puts out the best power for it's physical size? The .72?
shawn085 is offline   Quick reply to this message.

Sponsored Links - Subscribe to remove this ad.
Old 11-23-2005, 04:33 AM   #2
Jollidude
RCC Expert Contributor
 
Jollidude's Avatar
 
I am: Wayne J
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Halifax, NS

Feedback: 43 / 100%
Posts: 846
Total Props: 0
The 72 is probably the best size for a 40 size aircraft, it weighs the same or less than a typical 46 size two stroke, puts out much more torque (for turning big efficient props) and sounds better to boot. I think the Saito 82 is about the same weigh too if you are a Tim Taylor type of guy. The plane would be definitely way over-powered with the 82.

Cheers!

Jollidude
Jollidude is offline   Quick reply to this message.
Old 11-24-2005, 10:06 PM   #3
jake_027
RCC Pro Contributor
 
jake_027's Avatar
 
I am: Dave V
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Binbrook, ON
Radio of choice:
Spektrum ix14

Feedback: 30 / 100%
Posts: 1,796
Total Props: 5
Well...if you are looking at a 3D plane like a Funtana, than I would go with the Saito .82. I know someone that has this setup and it works really well. It mainly depends on your flying style and the type of plane.

Dave
jake_027 is offline   Quick reply to this message.
 
Old 11-25-2005, 11:32 AM   #4
Mike Biedul
RCC Junior Contributor
 
Mike Biedul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stony Plain, Alberta

Feedback: 0 / 0%
Posts: 225
Total Props: 0
I agree with JilliDude and Dave. The Saito .82 is a great machine in a small package. In a .40 size plane you may want to consider a 3-blade prop to reduce diameter for gear clearance. I believe that if choosing between the Saito .72 and the .82, it is nice to detune the Saito .82 with a bigger prop with less pitch than you would use on the .72 and the .82 will run cooler and last longer. For the results a .72 gives with high nitro, you could get the same power from the .82 with milder (and less corrosive) fuel. Everyyone in my club that has an .82, including myself, likes it.
Mike Biedul is offline   Quick reply to this message.
Closed Thread

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the RCCanada - Canada Radio Controlled Hobby Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

Member names may only be composed of alpha-numeric characters. (A-Z and 0-9)

!!ATTENTION ADVERTISERS!! If you intend on advertising anything on this forum, whatsoever, you are required to first contact us here . Additionally, we do NOT allow BUSINESS NAMES unless you are an Authorized Vendor. If you own a business, and want to do sales on this site via posting or private message, you will need to follow the rules. Shops, Stores, Distributors, Group Buys without being authorized will see your account terminated.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Radio of choice?
Which radio is your current favorite to use?
Number of RC Vehicles?
How many boats, cars, planes do you own?

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
vBulletin Message

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM.


vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.