U.S. Senate Passes "Special Rule for Model Aircraft" - Page 4 - RCCanada - Canada Radio Controlled Hobby Forum
RCCanada - Canada's Radio Control Hobby Forum
General RC Aircraft Discussion Discuss anything RC related

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2011, 05:09 PM   #31
RCC Senior Contributor
repeter_246's Avatar
I am: Ron 2729
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Alliston, Ontario
Radio of choice:
JR X9303, JR 10X
# of RCs: 12

Feedback: 52 / 100%
Posts: 562
Total Props: 0
Angry FAA seeks to restrict model aircraft flight

       Remove this ad - become a site supporter!
Academy Of Model Aeronautics Warns About Heavy Restrictions Coming From Washington

The Academy of Model Aeronautics tells ANN that the FAA is set to place "heavy restrictions" on the hobbyists who fly model aircraft. In a circular sent to ANN over the weekend, the AMA indicates that the agency is poised to impose severe restrictions on the model aviation hobby, sport and industry that will have a potentially devastating impact on a recreational and educational activity pursued by hundreds of thousands of enthusiasts, tens of thousands of employees and an industry that generates more than $1 billion in revenue.

According to the AMA, the FAA created an Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) in 2008 tasked with proposing recommendations for small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) that have been proliferating, particularly those in the commercial realm. The ARC’s charge was to draft recommended rules relative to establishing regulations for commercial sUAS and to define model aircraft – nothing more. AMA’s members are strictly hobbyists, sportsmen and educators. They are recreational users that do not participate in commercial activities. AMA was assured that the recreational modeler would be exempted from regulation.

In 2008, the ARC began its work with 20 members, more than half of which were from the commercial and public sectors with partisan interests. AMA was the lone seat for the hobbyist. AMA’s says its views and concerns were quickly swept aside in the haste to create enabling regulation for the commercial/public use sUAS industry. Subsequent protests and historical data presented by AMA have been repeatedly dismissed.

In March 2009, the ARC submitted its report to the FAA recommending a two-path approach for model aviation. This two-path approach proposes a “default path” that contains a devastating set of heavy-handed regulations and restrictions that will have a detrimental impact on the industry and thousands of aeromodeling enthusiasts not involved in AMA’s membership or programming. Alternatively, AMA must develop and fund an acceptable set of standards in order to overcome the restrictive effects of the default regulations. The two-path approach is extremely problematic and will adversely affect the aeromodeling community. AMA voiced strong opposition to this approach in the ARC’s report to the FAA.

AMA says that over the past 18 months it has worked diligently in an attempt to develop an acceptable set of standards to address FAA concerns. At the same time, however, the ground rules continue to change, creating a moving target and mounting frustration.

AMA believes that the proposed regulations fail to address the substantial diversity of the hobby and its applications and establishes unenforceable restrictions, while leaving absent a safety surveillance program to support the thousands of modelers outside of AMA’s formal structure and standards.

Although the exact language of the proposed regulation is not yet known, there are a number of conclusions that can be drawn from the ARC recommendations. The following are AMA’s areas of concern, the restrictions that are likely to be imposed and their effect on the model aviation community:

* ALTITUDE: As proposed, the rule would impose a nationwide altitude ceiling of 400 feet. AMA recognizes the need for altitude limitations when model aircraft are operated in close proximity to airports, and this concept is supported in AMA’s current Safety Code. However, a nationwide altitude ceiling for model aircraft is impractical, unnecessary, unrealistic and unenforceable through any reasonable means of compliance and detection.

* SPEED: It is likely that the rule will attempt to limit model aircraft performance by establishing a set speed limit such as 100 mph. Imposing such a speed limit will have little to no effect on aircraft performance and is both undetectable and unenforceable through any practical, cost-effective means.

* WEIGHT: As proposed, the sUAS rule will limit small unmanned aircraft to 55 pounds or less, and the implication for AMA’s Large Model Aircraft Program has not yet been determined. Without an acceptable standard or an alternative means of compliance, this rule may well curtail a vital element of the modeling activity that drives creativity, innovation and technological development.

* TURBINE BAN: The blanket prohibition of gas turbine engines suggested in the ARC recommendations does not consider the wide range of products currently in the marketplace. The inclusion of this prohibition in the proposed rule will impose a significant and unjustified economic impact on the industry.

* AIRPORT PROXIMITY: It is understood that the FAA is considering going outside the ARC’s recommendation and extending the “area of concern” around the nation’s 19,760 airports beyond the current 3-mile radius that has been the standard for more than 29 years. The intent to extend this radius has absolutely no statistical basis, has no supporting data and has no accident or incident correlation. Doing so would exponentially impact the number of existing flying sites affected by the rule. Extending the radius by as little as 2 miles (to 5 miles) would nearly triple the area of concern and create more than 1,784,000 square miles in which “no fly without permission” restrictions would be imposed.

It is the position of the AMA that, based upon the direction the rule is headed, it is clearly evident that the intent is not to objectively evaluate the model aircraft operations and realistically assess the risks. It is rather to unfairly eliminate model aviation from the safety equation by arbitrarily eliminating it from the airspace it has revered and safely used for decades. The organization urges all who are in favor of full analysis, regulatory restraint and fair play to help AMA save a hobby, a dynamic sport, a vital educational pursuit, and a $1 billion industry from what it says is undue government intervention that will have devastating consequences.
repeter_246 is offline   Quick reply to this message.

Sponsored Links - Subscribe to remove this ad.
Old 02-23-2011, 06:24 PM   #32
RCC Master Contributor
Daren71's Avatar
I am: Daren M.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mississauga, ON
Radio of choice:

Feedback: 11 / 100%
Posts: 1,337
Total Props: 9
Re: FAA seeks to restrict model aircraft flight

Discussed at some length here already.

If you can't be kind, at least have the decency to be vague.
Daren71 is offline   Quick reply to this message.
Old 02-23-2011, 06:32 PM   #33
RCC Expert Contributor
pep's Avatar
I am: Phil E. P
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: courtice on.

Feedback: 14 / 100%
Posts: 934
Total Props: 2
Re: FAA seeks to restrict model aircraft flight

Hey Ron, you gona sell all your turbines and jets for .30 on the dollar like that guy in the States!! Nothing cast in stones yet, do not jump the gun.
pep is offline   Quick reply to this message.
Old 02-23-2011, 07:27 PM   #34
RCC Master Contributor
mrrandyman's Avatar
I am: Randy
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Penticton BC.
Radio of choice:
JR and Spectrum
# of RCs: 4

Feedback: 14 / 100%
Posts: 1,073
Total Props: 9
British Columbia U.S. Senate Passes "Special Rule for Model Aircraft"

Some good news for Americans.
mrrandyman is offline   Quick reply to this message.
Old 02-23-2011, 08:18 PM   #35
RCC Contributor
CdnFlyer's Avatar
I am: Bill s
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Radio of choice:
Futaba 9CAP
# of RCs: 11

Feedback: 2 / 100%
Posts: 353
Total Props: 2
Re: U.S. Senate Passes "Special Rule for Model Aircraft"

Why does someone always want to kill the fun

At least this is a step in the right direction, but I can see that this will soon be so regulated that the fun will be gone anyway. I will enjoy it while I can
Bill - Burlington Radio Control Modelers
MAAC - 47841L, IMAA - 31638, WMWA - CAN10
Married 42 years to a great wife who lets me go to the flying field and weekend events
I'm gonna have two more flights, but go home after the next one!!!!!
CdnFlyer is offline   Quick reply to this message.
Old 02-23-2011, 08:24 PM   #36
RCC Supreme Contributor
I am: Mike G
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Elmira Ont.
Radio of choice:
Futaba 9c
# of RCs: 14

Feedback: 40 / 100%
Posts: 5,082
Total Props: 15
Re: U.S. Senate Passes "Special Rule for Model Aircraft"

Originally Posted by mrrandyman View Post
Hmm doesnt the membership in the AMA of 140,000 appear to be low compared to the total population of the USA. I would think membershipwould be much higher. Wonder what the number of MAAC members is each year for all of Canada
To a tree, balsa wood and MonoKote taste just like chicken!

Sponsored by.
Small Pay cheque
Understanding Wife
Loving Daughter

Thought for the day

Handle every stressful situation like a dog.

If you can't eat it or hump it.

Pee on it and walk away.
hifly2104 is offline   Quick reply to this message.
Old 02-23-2011, 10:02 PM   #37
RCC Contributor
Gooseman240's Avatar
I am: Evan R
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Athabasca
Radio of choice:
The one that came with the plane :S
# of RCs: 2

Feedback: 0 / 0%
Posts: 345
Total Props: 0
Re: U.S. Senate Passes "Special Rule for Model Aircraft"

Well, I fly a plane, it is 2 hrs from a MAAC field, and I have a place to fly at a private field. I know I should support the org, but not right now. I am sure the same is felt in the US but I would expect a higher enrollment due to pop.
Nothing like the smell of castor in the morning!!!!!

Super Sportster 40 MKII
Nexstar Select - Rebuild (covering job, convert to tail dragger)

P-47 Razorback
Harvard (AT-6)
(Undecided on a bipe, pitts? or hog? 60"-80" wingspan)
Gooseman240 is offline   Quick reply to this message.
Old 02-23-2011, 10:38 PM   #38
RCC Supreme Contributor
OICU812's Avatar
I am: Shawn S
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central, Alberta

Feedback: 31 / 100%
Posts: 2,405
Total Props: 19
Re: FAA seeks to restrict model aircraft flight

Bah whatever, if it ever came to the feds being hard asses they'd never keep up with bandits!
Once upon a time there were Nitros, Flybars & Frequency pins
My Main OL Photo Gallery: http://www.runryder.com/helicopter/gallery/28268/
OICU812 is offline   Quick reply to this message.
Old 02-24-2011, 04:23 AM   #39
★ Site Supporter ★★ Administrator ★
Max's Avatar
I am: Max P.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aurora, Ontario
Radio of choice:
JR and Spektrum

Feedback: 20 / 100%
Posts: 13,443
Total Props: 149
Re: U.S. Senate Passes "Special Rule for Model Aircraft"

I think it was a good move; to separate legislation for UAV's from recreational RC aircraft.

Face it, UAV laws are coming and are necessary. Giving the model aircraft community an "out" from these laws is a good thing.
Max is online now   Quick reply to this message.
Old 02-24-2011, 04:31 AM   #40
★ Site Supporter ★★ Administrator ★
Max's Avatar
I am: Max P.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aurora, Ontario
Radio of choice:
JR and Spektrum

Feedback: 20 / 100%
Posts: 13,443
Total Props: 149
Re: FAA seeks to restrict model aircraft flight

I think this subject has just been covered here:


where US senate just passed a resolution that states recreational RC model aircraft are exempt from the UAV laws....
Max is online now   Quick reply to this message.

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the RCCanada - Canada Radio Controlled Hobby Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

Member names may only be composed of alpha-numeric characters. (A-Z and 0-9)

!!ATTENTION ADVERTISERS!! If you intend on advertising anything on this forum, whatsoever, you are required to first contact us here . Additionally, we do NOT allow BUSINESS NAMES unless you are an Authorized Vendor. If you own a business, and want to do sales on this site via posting or private message, you will need to follow the rules. Shops, Stores, Distributors, Group Buys without being authorized will see your account terminated.
User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Your Name
Your first name and last initial is required if you plan on using the forum.
Which city & province you live in. This is mandatory for classified listings.
Radio of choice?
Which radio is your current favorite to use?
Number of RC Vehicles?
How many boats, cars, planes do you own?


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
vBulletin Message

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A BIG "Thank You" from Aurora Model Aircraft Bdegan Events 6 03-16-2010 07:55 PM
"Tiny 3D" 18" EPP model - Flight Video bwoollia Fixed Wing 6 03-03-2010 01:47 PM
AX-10 heavily modded bling U-tube Special aka "The Red Scorpion"!!! straightmgt8 FS - Cars and Trucks 5 03-26-2009 05:46 PM
BUILD LOG 72 inch Elf Biplane "Special" Flying Farmer Nostalgia - Old Timer Aircraft 4 11-28-2008 01:15 PM
NIB SAITO 120 SPECIAL NEW LOWER PRICE " SOLD" Bryan Hewitt FS - Engines 2 12-02-2003 01:15 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.

vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2016 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.